在2026美加墨世界杯上，亚足联创纪录的派遣9支球队参赛，然而9队的整体表现低迷。    "I believe the New York Times report is correct in every detail," says Philip Giraldi, a former CIA station chief and military intelligence officer. "It is what I have been hearing. There is considerable training at the Grafenwoehr, Germany army base to familiarize the Ukrainians with the new weapons arriving. Meanwhile there are cadres of special operations soldiers and intelligence personnel operating primarily in western Ukraine. They are not in uniform and many of them are working under various cover designations, including sometimes loose affiliations with foreign embassies and NGOs. All of which means that Biden and other Western leaders are lying about their active participation in the conflict.",Ahead of the Russian special operation to demilitarize and de-Nazify Ukraine, the US withdrew its own 150 military instructors. However, some CIA operatives continued their service in the country secretly, directing most of the intelligence flow the US is sharing with Ukrainian forces, according to the NYT. In addition to that, commandos from Washington's NATO allies have been managing the flow of weapons and equipment in Ukraine and providing training. The NYT specifies, citing American and other Western officials that the commandos are not on the front lines with Ukrainian troops.,Even though the US and NATO member states do not acknowledge that their personnel are operating in Ukraine, Russia and other intelligence services around the world are aware of this, according to the newspaper.,"The potential downside for the president comes when some of these soldiers in mufti get killed or, worse, captured and start to talk about their role," says Giraldi. "The Biden Administration has staked its reputation and possible political future on enabling Ukraine to survive without succumbing to Russian demands.",Deploying CIA personnel (which encompasses military as well as intelligence operatives) "is completely typical of the initial stages of a US-backed long war, and for long-term political manipulation of the target country," according to retired US Air Force Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, a former analyst for the US Department of Defense.,"This is the future that neoconservative 'strategists' in DC and their British and European allies imagine for Ukraine," Kwiatkowski highlights. "Rather than a negotiated conclusion, with a new Ukrainian role as a neutral and productive country, independent of both Russian and US political influences, the US government and CIA see Ukraine as an expendable yet useful satrap in its competition with the Russian Federation.",The ex-DoD analyst emphasizes that the effort is serious, given that the funding for CIA operations and arms sales and support and training has been flowing freely from Congress and President Biden. It also means that the intel operations in and around Ukraine are "of critical importance" to Washington, according to her.,Situation in UkraineNATO is De Facto at War With Russia but is Using Ukraine as a Tool, US Scholar Says5 April, 17:37 GMT,Ukraine is Washington's Proxy in Effort to Destroy Russia,"Ukraine was being used long before 2021 and 2022, as a US proxy, for global money laundering by multiple players, and for CIA political operations," explains Kwiatkowski. "The US diplomats and the CIA view Ukraine and its various people as pawns on a chessboard they can manage. Given that the US people are not willing to engage in a ground or air war with Russia over Ukraine, those pawns might need to be preserved for the next stage.",Washington's current interest in Ukraine dates back to at least the George W. Bush era, and probably much earlier, with the US foreign policy establishment making steady efforts to drive a wedge between Russia and its neighbor, according to the military veteran. Washington has made considerable financial, diplomatic and political investment in Ukraine over the recent decades and it cannot afford "losing" it.,"Coming on the heels of similar 'losses' in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and potentially some of the Gulf states, there are those in Washington who would find the complete loss of Ukraine unacceptable," she stresses.,The US is equally involved in former Soviet and Warsaw Pact countries, such as Lithuania, and Poland, to take the post-Soviet space under control "as part of the war to maintain US influence and contain Russian influence," according to the former Pentagon analyst. "Recent Lithuanian steps to enforce EU sanctions on the Russian Baltic Sea trade port and naval city of Kaliningrad speaks to the nature of what is to come, in the eyes of the US strategists," she points out.,"Ukraine is a proxy; the West is trying to destroy Russia, it's that simple," echoes Larry Johnson, a veteran of the CIA and the State Department’s Office of Counter Terrorism, which provided training to the US Military’s Special Operations taskforce for 24 years. "It would be one thing if Russia was the most evil, oppressive, authoritarian regime in the world. It's nowhere even close. Even though the West keeps trying to portray Russia as such. The fact of the matter is, the West wants the resources that Russia has and it wants to control Russia. Russia is not about to be controlled.",Situation in UkraineEx-CIA Analyst: US Military Aid Not a Game Changer for Kiev, Ukraine Has Already Lost6 June, 16:31 GMT,US Trying to Find the Way Out of Ukraine's Mess,Despite CIA and NATO personnel being deployed in Ukraine and NATO weapons constantly flowing to the country, Ukrainian troops have been increasingly outgunned by DPR/LPR military groups backed by Russia, acknowledges the NYT.,The newspaper names a number of reasons behind the Ukrainian Armed Forces' failures, including limited time for training to use sophisticated NATO weapons; huge losses among the "most battle-hardened" and well-trained Ukrainian forces; and certain limits to the expertise of the CIA, which is traditionally focused on counter-intelligence, among other matters.,"This is the fault of Hollywood," says Johnson. "There's always the assumption that all these CIA personnel are really some terrific people. They've got magical training capabilities. They don't. The CIA hasn't won a single insurgent war in the last 40 years, except going back to supporting the mujahedeen against the Soviets in Afghanistan. They're hoping to try to recreate that miracle. But again, the problem is the people who are assigned militarily to this kind of CIA activity are either retired, special forces, special operations personnel who had to get out because they were either physically unable to perform according to military standards, or it's people who've always wanted to do that kind of thing but really have had no special training in it.",Situation in UkraineUS Military Expert: Russia to Score Major Victories in Donbass, Must Adapt to New NATO Game22 May, 17:55 GMT,The former CIA analyst raises the question about the timing of the NYT exposure. He notes that it has never been a secret that in every foreign conflict the US was interested in, the US has routinely provided training and assistance, and dispatched the CIA's Special Activities Division to operate on the ground. Why is NYT openly writing about it now?,"I think the answer lies in the very last paragraph, last sentence of the article, where it is said: 'Would the enhancement of training be worth the possible price that is going to have to be paid?' The answer is 'probably not.' In other words, this is a gesture to show 'yeah, look, we're doing everything we can do to help the Ukrainians, we've provided we've provided special forces, special operations forces, we've brought them into other countries, we're sending our own people there, the CIA and their passive intelligence, so they can target Russian positions.' But when all is said and done, doing more is not going to really help.",According to Johnson, the NYT piece is "really sending a signal that the United States is trying to figure out how to disengage from this mess.","I think the purpose of this article coming out now is just to lay the groundwork for why we can't put or shouldn't put any more US military personnel or even CIA personnel inside Ukraine," the CIA veteran emphasizes. "Because continuing to put US personnel, whether they're CIA or military, inside Ukraine to train, is becoming too risky because of Russia's success on the battlefield."。仅有日本、澳大利亚跻身32强，但都止步首轮淘汰赛。赛后，很多媒体在讨论“谁是亚洲足球捍卫者”的问题，其中，伊朗队36岁的飞翼雷扎扬，无疑是一大热门。要说在2026美加墨世界杯上，哪支球队最令人惋惜，伊朗队是热门之一。根据国际足联官方排定的大赛成绩表（第5到第48名），亚洲球队占据了榜末五位中的三个席位（0分净负11球的伊拉克队垫底，0分净负9球的乌兹别克斯坦是倒数第三，0分净负5球的约旦是倒数第五）。

二 | 伊朗队3战保持不败，拿到3分，在48强中排名第33位——距离淘汰赛真的就差一步。在12个小组第三，8支可以跻身淘汰赛的赛制里，伊朗队是成绩第9好的小组第三，未能晋级。

三 | 而且伊朗队几乎就绝杀拿下了比赛，然而因为半个脚掌的越位，伊朗队最终无法更进一步，着实令人惋惜。

四 | 作为伊朗队出色表现的代表，36岁的边后卫雷扎扬，获得了举世称赞。他在对阵新西兰之战里，打入一球，助攻一次，成为世界杯正赛历史上，第一位单场比赛传射建功的伊朗球员。随后，他在伊朗队打平埃及之战里再度破门，赛后夺取全场最佳球员。

五 | 雷扎扬参加了2018俄罗斯世界杯、2022卡塔尔世界杯、2026美加墨世界杯，他还在卡塔尔世界杯里，伊朗队2-0击败威尔士之战里取得破门。年轻时的雷扎扬，被亚足联官方赞为“速度快、体力好，爆发力是亚洲顶级”，如今已经36岁的他，速度、爆发力很难再像年轻人那般生猛，为何还能有如此出色的表现？大赛后，雷扎扬通过社媒发布了一系列图片，人们才找到答案。这位球员世界杯后没有休息，而是去西班牙寻找场地积极的训练，他堪比健美运动员的身材，就是他用苦练、汗水浇灌出的成果。这是一位非常珍惜机会，深知每一次训练、每一场比赛的机会都来之不易，所以会拼尽全力去应对的球员！根据伊朗多家媒体的介绍，已经36岁的雷扎扬，收获了西班牙阿尔梅里亚等队的邀请，他有可能在这个年纪去欧洲联赛踢球。

六 | 这不仅仅是因为他在世界杯上，无论是进攻、防守，都有着可圈可点的表现，这也是因为，他在大赛结束后没有去度假休息，而是第一时间就投入训练的职业态度，让他收获了业界的好评和欣赏。雷扎扬的职业生涯大部分时间都是在中东的联赛（伊朗、卡塔尔）度过，只是在2017-18赛季短暂效力过比利时联赛。如今他已是36岁的老将，反而因为表现出色，获得了欧洲球队的青睐，这种“逆生长”令人赞叹，也成为2026世界杯期间，亚洲足球的一抹亮色。看足球上咪咕视频！（罗掌柜）