刑事侦缉档案2

孙俪突然发文，邓超回应！_我的网站

A |     来源：【杭州日报】1月11日，《甄嬛爱不停—甄嬛传小主节晚会》在中国澳门银河综艺馆举办。

B |     NEW DELHI -- India’s top court on Tuesday refused to legalize same-sex marriages, passing the responsibility back to Parliament in a ruling that disappointed campaigners for LGBTQ+ rights in the world's most populous country. Chief Justice DY Chandrachud also urged the government to uphold the rights of the queer community and end discrimination against them. Earlier this year, the five-judge bench heard 21 petitions that sought to legalize same-sex marriage. Chandrachud said there were degrees of agreement and disagreement among the justices “on how far we have to go” on same-sex marriages, but a majority of the judges agreed that the court cannot grant LGBTQ+ people the right to marry as that is a legislative function. “This court can’t make law. It can only interpret it and give effect to it,” the chief justice said, reiterating that it was up to Parliament to decide whether it could expand marriage laws to include queer unions.One of the petitioners, Mario da Penha, said it was “a day to be disappointed but not to lose hope.”“There's been tremendous work that has gone into these petitions, and many hopes and dreams of the queer community attached to them - to lead lives that most other Indians take for granted. The fact that the dream could not come to fruition today is a disappointment for all of us,” he said.He added that it was not yet clear if the court had set a mandate or timeline for Parliament to act. “Without that mandate, there is no pressure on Parliament to enact any legislation.”“There are queer couples today that are already families and in relationships, and are pillars of society. That they are not afforded the dignity and rights that they are due is deeply disappointing,” said Karuna Nundy, one of the lawyers representing the petitioners. Legal rights for LGBTQ+ people in India have been expanding over the past decade, mostly as a result of the Supreme Court’s intervention. In 2018, the top court struck down a colonial-era law that had made gay sex punishable by up to 10 years in prison and expanded constitutional rights for the gay community. The decision was seen as a historic victory for LGBTQ rights, with one judge saying it would “pave the way for a better future."Despite this progress, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government resisted the legal recognition of same-sex marriage and rejected several petitions in favor. During the hearings, the government argued that a marriage is only between a biological male and a biological woman, adding that same-sex marriages went against religious values and that the petitions reflected only “urban elitist views”. Religious groups too had opposed same-sex unions, saying they went against Indian culture.Adish Aggarwala, the president of the Supreme Court bar association, said the court had done the right thing by recognizing that this was a job for Parliament, an argument the government also made during the hearings. Lawyers for the petitioners argued that marriage is between two people, not just a man and woman. They said concepts of marriage have gradually changed with time and laws should acknowledge that. By not recognizing such unions, the government was depriving same-sex couples of their right to equality enshrined in the constitution and rights enjoyed by married heterosexual couples, from adoption and medical insurance to pensions and inheritance, they argued. “This court needs to push society to acknowledge same-sex marriage,” one of the lawyers said.Petitioners were hopeful that the Supreme Court could challenge the government’s position.But even as some of the justices urged that the state must make sure queer couples don't face harassment or discrimination in accessing basic needs, like opening a joint bank account, they stopped short of granting legal recognition to same-sex unions. Instead, the court accepted the government's offer to set up a special panel that will explore granting social and legal benefits to same-sex couples. Homosexuality has long carried a stigma in India’s traditional society, even though there has been a shift in attitudes toward same-sex couples in recent years. India now has openly gay celebrities and some high-profile Bollywood films have dealt with gay issues. According to a Pew survey, acceptance of homosexuality in India increased by 22 percentage points to 37% between 2013 and 2019.But same-sex couples often face harassment in many Indian communities, whether Hindu, Muslim or Christian.India is estimated to have at least 2.5 million LGBTQ+ people, according to government figures from 2012. However, gay rights activists and global estimates believe they number at least 10% of the population, or more than 135 million.In May, Taiwan became the first jurisdiction in Asia to recognize same-sex marriages. In July, Nepal's Supreme Court issued an interim order enabling the registration of same-sex marriages for the first time. It is still not clear when the court would make its final decision on the case.。1月12日，孙俪发文称：“昨晚最开心的应该是小花了，心愿完成。和各宫娘娘拍了照片还要了签名，为了表达她的激动，小花给我画了画送给了我。”对此，邓超还在评论区玩梗：“其实这是我。”作为当下最知名的“电子榨菜”之一，《甄嬛传》在播出后的十三年间，持续引发着社交媒体上的讨论和二创。

C | 其衍生出的“甄学家”群体，更是堪称互联网史上现象级的存在。

D | 在这次《甄嬛传》大型团建上，郑晓龙导演以及孙俪、陈建斌、蒋欣、蔡少芬等十多位主创将悉数亮相，堪称“人最齐的一次”。

E | “嬛嬛”孙俪献唱了《凤凰于飞》。

F | 这一幕，让剧粉们不禁大呼“今夕是何年？”2024年12月3日，孙俪曾发文称，女儿今年的生日愿望就是拍一套甄嬛的照片，最近刚刚帮她完成了心愿。孙俪表示，拍照时的形体指导是她自己。“摄影棚里一直放着甄嬛的音乐，为了让妹妹更好的进入拍摄状态，我还跟她一起回忆了好多片段，说出剧里的台词，感觉好多瞬间都回来了……那年我28岁，今年我的女儿都十岁了，时间都去哪了……”孙俪还提到，当年帮自己梳头的发型师露露，听到女儿的心愿，觉得特别有意思，都来帮女儿一起圆梦了。

G | 评论区，网友们纷纷表示，“妹妹太有福气了”“神态真的很像甄嬛，不愧是‘嬛嬛亲生的’！”“孙俪的姿态还和演甄嬛时一模一样，一点也没变。”据悉，孙俪女儿和甄嬛的缘分从2023年就开始了，孙俪曾发文说自己女儿说想看甄嬛传，“我在陪我女儿看甄嬛传，她问我这部戏讲什么，我怎么用一句话解释给她听呢？”来源｜九派新闻编辑 杜海锋 审核 蒋波 钟玮更多新闻下载杭州首席新闻客户端“杭州新闻”点赞分享在看本文来自【杭州日报】，仅代表作者观点。全国党媒信息公共平台提供信息发布传播服务。

Current article:http://www.jiubengtaibingpengou.pics/news/20260826_85286.html

Published on:11:45:53